Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tatjana Maria vs Mayar Sherif Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Maria vs Sherif analysis and find out who is favored!
Tatjana Maria vs Mayar Sherif Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Maria 0 - 0 Sherif
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Maria has won 43.74% of points on their second serve, while Sherif has won 47.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Maria, in recent form, has won 53.58% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sherif has won 53.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.77% and 41.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Maria has saved 45.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sherif has saved 53.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Maria has won 50% of matches played (W/L 32/ 32), with Sherif winning 59.26% (W/L 32/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Maria has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 63/ 32), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 196/ 193). Sherif has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 74% (W/L 183/ 64), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Maria has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 46.67% of matches (W/L 14/ 16), where as Sherif has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 82.61% of matches (W/L 19/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Maria has played against opponents with an average rank of 170.3 while Sherif has played against players with an average rank of 146.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Maria has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sherif has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Maria has converted 47.66% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sherif has converted 49.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
65
Rank
42
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
53
Rank
31
High
28
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
56% (616-485)
Career Total W/L
65% (257-137)
43% (12-16)
YTD W/L
58% (15-11)
$2,333,842
Career Prize Money
$983,588
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tatjana Maria | Mayar Sherif |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (12/16) | 58% (15/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (28/38) | 57% (34/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (273/317) | 53% (289/261) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (6/8) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) | 65% (15/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.32 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 92 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 80 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:3 | 1:47:43 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 157.96 | 139.15 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (1068/1939) | 75% (1339/1796) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (660/1068) | 60% (799/1339) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (381/871) | 48% (218/457) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (102/214) | 49% (106/216) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (829/1926) | 45% (820/1816) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 40% (4/6) | 57% (4/3) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 46% (6/7) | 43% (3/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 78% (7/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (11/27) | 58% (15/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 55% (6/11) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (12/8) | 100% (14/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (12/4) | 0% (14/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (16/3) | 8% (12/1) |
Tatjana Maria Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Clara Tauson
Player
Tatjana Maria
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Tatjana Maria
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Tatjana Maria
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
49%
(
47 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Tatjana Maria
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Peyton Stearns
58%
(
66 of
114)
1st Serve %
75%
(
85 of
114)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
46 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Tatjana Maria
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Laura Pigossi
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
75 of
100)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
100)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Tatjana Maria
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Julia Riera
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mayar Sherif Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Mayar Sherif
84%
(
47 of
56)
1st Serve %
81%
(
51 of
63)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Yue Yuan
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Mayar Sherif
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
11 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Aya El Aouni
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
90%
(
45 of
50)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anna Schmiedlova
Player
Mayar Sherif
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
80%
(
90 of
112)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
47 of
90)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Renata Zarazua
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Susan Bandecchi
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Maria Vs Sherif Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
